RFC: License header / file doc comment change

Only small issues, but

  • it’s very likely not a “script”
  • it does not belong to the Flow framework because the Flow framework is not a person
  • does “Form” belong to the Flow framework or to the Neos CMS?
  • the asterisks on the right hand side are not recognised by all parsers correctly (for example by Discourse)
  • we should not mention the license directly but instead refer to the LICENSE file, because that one is authoritative
  • if a file ends up somewhere with out the package context (Gist etc), it’s nice to have a reference to www.neos.io

It’s one header which can be used for all files of the Neos Project, you simply have to change the package name.