We’ll need to take a decision on the new names for our Twitter accounts (that is, @typo3neos and @typo3flow).
I basically see two options:
stay with two accounts (@neoscms and @flowframework)
continue with one account (use @typo3neos for that, but with a new name)
If we go for option 1), we could also introduce @neosfoundation or the like in the future.
However, we already neglected the @typo3flow account in the past and would probably be better off communicating via one account. But if we went for 2), what which Twitter username would we choose? @neosproject and @neos are not available (@theneosproject is available, but pretty long). Would @neoscms be okay?
Before we vote on this: which other arguments or ideas do you have?
I would like that. Twitter is really outward facing, so better use something simple stupid there. If we feel the urge to communicate more about flow, let’s find a 2nd account for that (e.g. @flowframework - btw. I just reserved that account for us).
I would go with 1 account at the moment @neoscms. If the traffic/discussions and user base become big enough opening up additional accounts is easy enough and can be communicated and explained (and we could reserve additional accounts already)